Skip to Content

An Important Announcement
We are excited to announce the long-awaited Duotrope community! Create your profile, high five your fellow creators, and journey along Rejection Road.

Editor Interview: Subtropics

Describe what you publish in 25 characters or less.

Imaginative writing.

What other current publications (or publishers) do you admire most?

Journals: Tin House, A Public Space, Electric Literature, The Paris Review, Noon, The New York Tyrant, The Mississippi Review, Boulevard, Ploughshares, The Virginia Quarterly Review, The Kenyon Review, 32 Poems, One Story, Field, Pleiades.
Publishers: New York Review Books, Dalkey Archive, Other Press, Tin House Books, Dzanc Books, Open Letter Books.

If you publish writing, who are your favorite writers? If you publish art, who are your favorite artists?

Fiction writers we admire and have published include John Barth, Allan Gurganus, Roy Kesey, Eileen Pollack, John Brandon, Olga Slavnikova, Padgett Powell. Poets we admire and have published include D. A. Powell, Billy Collins, Idra Novey, Kevin Prufer, Lucia Perillo, Matthea Harvey, Richard Kenney, and Kathleen Rooney.
In our fiction pantheon: Grace Paley, John Cheever, Joy Williams, Penelope Fitzgerald, Barry Hannah, Donald Barthelme.

What sets your publication apart from others that publish similar material?

Though this might not set us apart, Subtropics is run and edited entirely by writers.

What is the best advice you can give people who are considering submitting work to your publication?

Submit work that you like, not work that you think we'll like.
Don't submit more than once during a submissions period.
Keep your cover letter short. Don't try to sell yourself. The writing is what matters.

Describe the ideal submission.

A piece of writing so startling and memorable as to restore our faith in literature.

What do submitters most often get wrong about your submissions process?

I see several recurrent missteps:
1. Work that, in its effort to seize our attention, comes across as exhibitionistic.
2. Work that, in its caution and taste, comes across as boring.
3. Work that reads as if it has been written by a committee. (This is particularly true of submissions from students in MFA programs.)

How much do you want to know about the person submitting to you?

We prefer cover letters that are short and to the point. Email addresses are essential. If you have an MFA degree, that is worth mentioning, as are recent publications and awards. Also, if someone we know has suggested that you submit to us, be sure to mention this person's name.

If you publish writing, how much of a piece do you read before making the decision to reject it?

We stop reading at the point at which we would stop reading if we were browsing in a bookstore and got bored.

What additional evaluations, if any, does a piece go through before it is accepted?

If a reader is positively inclined toward a piece, it is read by two or three other readers before a final decision is made.

What is a day in the life of an editor like for you?

I am also a writer and a teacher so I usually read submissions only two days a week. As a rule we meet as a group and read aloud to one another from the submissions. Those submissions that survive this process are farmed out to be read more carefully. Those that are received favorably are passed on for second or third readings.

Cookie Consent: This site uses secure first-party cookies for essential, preference-setting, and statistical purposes. We do not use any marketing, advertising, or third-party cookies. Read our full cookie policy.